Games developed by Wide Games
We provide a list of companies that developed abandonware games.
Select a company to view its games.
To make searching easier, use pagination by number or letter.
Pilot Down: Behind Enemy Lines
During World War II, more than 180,000 allied airmen were shot down in enemy territory. In this game, one of them tries to crawl through enemy territory to safety in Switzerland.
The game consists mainly of crawling through various environments, such as sawmills and wilderness areas, making as little noise as possible to avoid detection by the Germans. Players must use various objects (such as cigarette boxes to distract the guards, apples to quickly replenish stamina, etc. ) to complete the levels. Staying too long in the freezing water is not a good idea, as the player character has stamina and when the stamina meter runs out, the health meter begins to deplete. Therefore, it is a good idea to warm up by a fire from time to time or eat something to regain stamina. Of course, there are also weapons with which you can take down unapproachable enemies. Weapons range from piano wire to machine pistols.
Prisoner of War: World War II
Prisoner of War: World War II arrived on Windows in 2002 and immediately positioned itself as a grim experiment in survival, rather than a swaggering combat fantasy. Its premise centers on captivity, interrogations, and the constant negotiation between hunger, fear, and opportunity. Instead of treating the war as a backdrop, the game turns confinement into the main battlefield, forcing players to think like detainees who must read routines, conserve resources, and exploit small openings. The theme is somber yet compelling, asking you to win by staying alive long enough to outmaneuver your captors.
What makes the gameplay stand out is how it blends mission progression with systems that feel lived-in. You manage basic needs, track objectives tied to escape plans, and make decisions that carry emotional and practical weight. Stealth and planning matter, but so does timing: a guard’s patrol rhythm, a locked door’s schedule, or the availability of tools can determine whether a promising lead collapses into disaster. Encounters tend to punish careless movement, while successful play often resembles problem solving under pressure, where every click has consequences.
The game also leans into environmental storytelling. Camp layouts, barracks routines, and scattered clues encourage a methodical mindset, and the world changes subtly as you learn how people behave and where supervision is tightest. Unlocking progress often involves small interactions with the rules of the setting, including barter-like exchanges, information gathering, and the occasional high-risk gamble. Even when action breaks out, it usually feels like a temporary interruption rather than the defining rhythm, keeping the spotlight on stealth, escape strategy, and avoidance.
Visually, it matches early 2000s expectations: no extravagant polish, but enough clarity to follow the flow of confinement and the shape of threats. Sound design supports the atmosphere with tense audio cues, from distant commotion to the sharper signals that hint at discovery. The overall presentation aims for plausibility, presenting the camp as a functional machine driven by hierarchy and discipline. For many players, the atmosphere is the hook, because it turns tension into a constant companion instead of a set piece.
The 2002 POW title remains notable for its willingness to focus on captivity rather than celebration of violence, and for its insistence on cautious decision making. If you enjoy war-themed games that reward patience, observation, and adaptive thinking, it offers a distinct flavor within the genre. Its legacy is less about blockbuster spectacle and more about a particular kind of dread-driven play, where progress is earned through discretion and resilience.
